← Models

Model profile

Llama 4 Maverick

Metadeveloper
2025-04-05release date
#203 / 346Safety rank
#259 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Llama 4 Maverick has an estimated Safety rank of #203; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #148–#265. Its behavior-only rank is #198; company governance moves the combined estimate to #203. Published Safety evidence spans 36 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #1 of 53); its weakest is The Dictatorship Eval (overall_resistance_rate, #20 of 20).

Freedom. Llama 4 Maverick has an estimated Freedom rank of #259; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #183–#329. Published Freedom evidence spans 20 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #1 of 69); its weakest is SOSBench (medicine_pvr, #18 of 23).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#271 / 358↓0.8888Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#20 / 31↓53.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#15 / 31↓66.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#16 / 31↓52.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#20 / 31↓80Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#17 / 31↓59.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#14 / 31↓77.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#15 / 31↓66.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#19 / 31↓73.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#18 / 31↓51.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#13 / 31↓60.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#14 / 31↓58.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#19 / 31↓76.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#10 / 24↓5.14Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#11 / 24↓43.44Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#30 / 48↑75Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#37 / 80↑0.686Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#15 / 24↑4.175Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#14 / 24↑3.581Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#17 / 24↑3.084Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#9 / 24↑3.867Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#18 / 24↑3.567Source ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#19 / 24↑3.422Source ↗official
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment — blackmailmisaligned_action_rate_pct#1 / 16↓0Source ↗official
Anthropic Agentic Misalignment — corporate espionagemisaligned_action_rate_pct#7 / 16↓44Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#70 / 122↑0.29Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#72 / 104↓56.23Source ↗official
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#38 / 54↑66.17Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#42 / 63↑74.07Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#46 / 56↑73.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#43 / 63↑83.78Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#39 / 55↑9.635Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#55 / 63↑70.52Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#18 / 55↑60.03Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#31 / 54↑47.7Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#29 / 54↑51.89Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#26 / 54↑62.38Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#34 / 62↑58.22Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#25 / 63↑86.53Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#40 / 63↑15.86Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#1 / 53↑100Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#41 / 63↑72.2Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#42 / 63↑79.2Source ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#34 / 52↓28.22Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#27 / 50↓64.93Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#36 / 50↓65.83Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#27 / 50↓72.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#25 / 50↓66.73Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#23 / 50↓68.6Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#18 / 50↓68.63Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#233 / 270↑10.34Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#62 / 270↑91.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#106 / 270↑82.22Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#85 / 268↑97.82Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#39 / 60↓40.09Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#29 / 59↓4.95Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#54 / 80↑0.982Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#43 / 80↑0.93Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#52 / 80↑0.661Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#29 / 80↑0.993Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#32 / 80↑0.965Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#50 / 54↑23.02Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#27 / 69↑0Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#35 / 42↓83Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#37 / 43↑22.55Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#35 / 43↑29.74Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#30 / 43↑27.05Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#35 / 43↑26.17Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#29 / 43↑35.37Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#26 / 45↓8.333Source ↗self run
MASKlying_probability_pct#41 / 53↓50.27Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#10 / 21↑22.64Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchaverage_severity#10 / 12↓1.682Source ↗official
ODCV-Benchmisalignment_rate#2 / 12↓16.22Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#5 / 66↑0.7365Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#43 / 70↑0.7147Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#53 / 70↑0.8925Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#34 / 67↑0.4899Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#10 / 14↓0.696Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#11 / 14↓0.716Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#11 / 14↓0.844Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#7 / 23↓0.288Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#7 / 23↓0.238Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#6 / 23↓0.426Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#8 / 23↓0.652Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#8 / 23↓0.24Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#6 / 23↓0.242Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchexplicit_speciesism_scale#7 / 7↓3.3Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchmorally_wrong_rate#2 / 8↑42.67Source ↗official
SpeciesismBenchspeciesism_recognition_rate#4 / 8↑88.97Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#28 / 131↑6.97Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#92 / 131↓4.72Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#93 / 131↓4.9Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#115 / 131↓2.65Source ↗official
The Dictatorship Evaloverall_resistance_rate#20 / 20↑0Source ↗official
TrustLLM contemporary collapsed applicationtrustllm#7 / 8↑0.6Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_cultural_asr#4 / 6↓22.4Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_harm_asr#4 / 6↓16.9Source ↗official
TukaBenchafrijail_mono_asr#4 / 6↓22Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#36 / 94↑91.8Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#19 / 23↑28Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#12 / 31↑53.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#16 / 31↑66.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#16 / 31↑52.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#10 / 31↑80Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#15 / 31↑59.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#18 / 31↑77.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#17 / 31↑66.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#12 / 31↑73.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#14 / 31↑51.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#19 / 31↑60.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#17 / 31↑58.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#12 / 31↑76.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#15 / 24↑5.14Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#14 / 24↑43.44Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#44 / 80↓0.686Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#33 / 104↑56.23Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#22 / 63↓74.07Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#11 / 56↓73.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-PoliticalPersuasionsafety_score#26 / 56↓58.57Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#20 / 63↓83.78Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#24 / 54↓47.7Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#26 / 54↓51.89Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#29 / 54↓62.38Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#39 / 63↓86.53Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#24 / 63↓15.86Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#23 / 63↓72.2Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#22 / 63↓79.2Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#206 / 270↓91.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#164 / 270↓82.22Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#181 / 268↓97.82Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#22 / 60↑40.09Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#29 / 59↓4.95Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#25 / 80↓0.982Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#29 / 80↓0.661Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#50 / 80↓0.993Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#32 / 80↑0.965Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#1 / 69↓0Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#7 / 43↓22.55Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#14 / 43↓27.05Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#9 / 43↓26.17Source ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#15 / 43↓35.37Source ↗official
MT-JailBench CrescendoXsafety_score#12 / 21↓22.64Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#18 / 70↓0.8925Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#34 / 67↓0.4899Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#5 / 14↑0.696Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#4 / 14↑0.716Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#4 / 14↑0.844Source ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#17 / 23↑0.288Source ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#17 / 23↑0.238Source ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#18 / 23↑0.426Source ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#16 / 23↑0.652Source ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#16 / 23↑0.24Source ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#18 / 23↑0.242Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#93 / 181↑58.3Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_cultural_asr#3 / 6↑22.4Source ↗official
TukaBenchafri_jbb_harm_asr#2 / 6↑16.9Source ↗official
TukaBenchafrijail_mono_asr#3 / 6↑22Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#25 / 156↑6Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#113 / 156↑2Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#4 / 23↓28Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-18.6
Government50.1
Diplomacy65.8
Economy45.3
Society62.8

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression1.75
Traditional ↔ Secular0.154