← Models

Model profile

Seed 2.0 Lite

ByteDancedeveloper
2026-02-14release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#491 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Seed 2.0 Lite does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (violent_crimes, #11 of 31); its weakest is DystopiaBench (orwell_score, #42 of 50).

Freedom. Seed 2.0 Lite has an estimated Freedom rank of #491; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #341–#610. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (intellectual_property, #10 of 31); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (violent_crimes, #21 of 31).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#12 / 31↓31.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#17 / 31↓69.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#17 / 31↓52.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#15 / 31↓71.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#22 / 31↓69.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#13 / 31↓76.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#13 / 31↓65Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#14 / 31↓65.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#14 / 31↓43.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#22 / 31↓70.45Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#18 / 31↓61.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#11 / 31↓55.6Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#25 / 50↓63.87Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#40 / 50↓67.33Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#32 / 50↓74.33Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#34 / 50↓68.7Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#42 / 50↓75.07Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#25 / 50↓72.8Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression3.52
Traditional ↔ Secular0.575