← Models

Model profile

Qwen3 Max

Alibabadeveloper
2025-09-24release date
#103 / 346Safety rank
#456 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Qwen3 Max has an estimated Safety rank of #103; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #71–#193. Its behavior-only rank is #91; company governance moves the combined estimate to #103. Published Safety evidence spans 9 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is UAVBench safety-critical decision recognition (ethical_safety_critical_accuracy, #2 of 27); its weakest is SpeciEval (land_animal_4ns, #128 of 131).

Freedom. Qwen3 Max has an estimated Freedom rank of #456; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #240–#554. Published Freedom evidence spans 5 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingness (willingness_direct_score, #4 of 156); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #145 of 181).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#284 / 358↓0.8992Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#23 / 31↓63.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#12 / 31↓64.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#12 / 31↓47.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#23 / 31↓80.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#15 / 31↓56.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#25 / 31↓88.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#14 / 31↓66Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#13 / 31↓63.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#15 / 31↓45.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#15 / 31↓61.38Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#16 / 31↓60.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#19 / 31↓76.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#8 / 24↓2.93Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#14 / 24↓55.44Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#6 / 48↑95Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#31 / 122↑0.545Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#36 / 66↑0.4477Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#35 / 70↑0.752Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#23 / 70↑0.954Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#36 / 67↑0.4835Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#22 / 131↑6.99Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#128 / 131↓5.26Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#127 / 131↓5.34Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#25 / 131↓1.52Source ↗official
TrustLLM contemporary collapsed applicationtrustllm#3 / 8↑0.62Source ↗official
UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy#2 / 27↑0.76Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#8 / 31↑63.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#19 / 31↑64.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#17 / 31↑47.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#9 / 31↑80.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#17 / 31↑56.2Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#7 / 31↑88.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#18 / 31↑66Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#19 / 31↑63.8Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#17 / 31↑45.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#17 / 31↑61.38Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#16 / 31↑60.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#12 / 31↑76.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#17 / 24↑2.93Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#11 / 24↑55.44Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#48 / 70↓0.954Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#32 / 67↓0.4835Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#145 / 181↑39.4Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#79 / 156↑1.5Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#4 / 156↑6Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-24.3
Government44.2
Diplomacy67.8
Economy47.4
Society60.9

Taiwan Sovereignty Benchmark Pro

DimensionValueDistribution
Pro-Taiwan rubric compatibility0
Warning-phrase rate20
Soft-censorship rate0
API-error rate35

Moral Trolley Arena