Model profile
Mimo V2.5
Evidence summary
Mimo V2.5 has an estimated overall rank of #88; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #35–#191. Its behavior-only rank is #87; company governance moves the combined estimate to #88. Published evidence spans 6 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #19 of 311); its weakest is Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESS (harmful_refusal_rate, #9 of 10).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗mimo-v2-5-0424
- Hugging Face ↗XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5
- OpenRouter ↗xiaomi/mimo-v2.5
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗direct research preview identity date
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #19 / 311 | 0.3215 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate | #51 / 105 | 0.295 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score | #7 / 50 | 30.8 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score | #4 / 50 | 27.13 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchhuxley_score | #10 / 50 | 33.8 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score | #7 / 50 | 39.97 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchorwell_score | #9 / 50 | 30.8 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| DystopiaBenchpetrov_score | #11 / 50 | 44.4 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSbenign_answer_rate | #7 / 10 | 94.6 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSharmful_refusal_rate | #9 / 10 | 64.8 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Inkling-Small model card — StrongREJECTsafety_rate | #3 / 10 | 99.3 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchadversarial | #42 / 73 | 80.49 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation | #50 / 73 | 81.85 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchanti_hallucination | #46 / 73 | 88.48 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Bencheq_boundaries | #15 / 73 | 70.51 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchoverfit | #33 / 73 | 75.96 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| TACbase_welfare_rate | #52 / 68 | 21.79 | ↑ higher | Source ↗self run |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.