← Models

Model profile

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Metadeveloper
2024-12-06release date
#131 / 267overall rank
24eval lineages
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has an estimated overall rank of #131; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #80–#201. Its behavior-only rank is #120; company governance moves the combined estimate to #131. Published evidence spans 24 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 102); its weakest is AnimalHarmBench (score, #10 of 10).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#199 / 3110.8511↓ lowerSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1#8 / 200.8895↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1#9 / 200.7079↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchstale_f1#12 / 200.6225↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1#12 / 200.7191↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1#8 / 200.6586↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1#13 / 200.7242↑ higherSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#22 / 3226↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#25 / 3226.8↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#26 / 3219↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#26 / 3242.8↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#26 / 3223.6↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#25 / 3229.1↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#26 / 3226↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#25 / 3224↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#27 / 3246.8↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#25 / 3225.9↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#24 / 3220.3↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#27 / 3238↓ lowerSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#22 / 243.951↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#18 / 243.346↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#19 / 243.063↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#16 / 243.28↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#20 / 243.365↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#22 / 243.277↑ higherSource ↗official
AnimalHarmBenchscore#10 / 10-0.015↑ higherSource ↗official
BlueBench AttaQ-100attaq_harmlessness_reward_pct#11 / 1883.8↑ higherSource ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#69 / 10553.54↓ lowerSource ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#19 / 5217.82↓ lowerSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#211 / 26011.11↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#140 / 26087.83↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#145 / 26066.11↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#109 / 25897.18↑ higherSource ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#32 / 4944.79↓ lowerSource ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#12 / 462.18↓ lowerSource ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#46 / 5424.21↑ higherSource ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#9 / 390.8364↓ lowerSource ↗official
LiveSecBenchethics#19 / 4354.35↑ higherSource ↗official
LiveSecBenchfactuality#38 / 4326.17↑ higherSource ↗official
LiveSecBenchlegality#14 / 4366.51↑ higherSource ↗official
LiveSecBenchprivacy#31 / 4330.35↑ higherSource ↗official
LiveSecBenchpsychological_health#40 / 4317.08↑ higherSource ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#27 / 319↓ lowerSource ↗self run
MANTAAWMS#3 / 70.476↑ higherSource ↗official
MANTAAWVS#4 / 70.422↑ higherSource ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#37 / 5348.07↓ lowerSource ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#35 / 460.95↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#35 / 660.4539↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#47 / 700.6883↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#58 / 700.8604↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#38 / 670.4768↑ higherSource ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#17 / 190.01333↑ higherSource ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#12 / 230.408↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#14 / 230.54↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#11 / 230.546↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#12 / 230.812↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#14 / 230.516↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#11 / 230.446↓ lowerSource ↗official
SpeciesismBenchmorally_wrong_rate#1 / 853.14↑ higherSource ↗official
SpeciesismBenchspeciesism_recognition_rate#2 / 896.34↑ higherSource ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 1027↑ higherSource ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#62 / 1024.64↓ lowerSource ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#63 / 1024.85↓ lowerSource ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#18 / 1021.53↓ lowerSource ↗official
SYCON Benchfalse_presupposition_tof#9 / 111.9↑ higherSource ↗official
SYCON Benchunethical_queries_tof#6 / 111.39↑ higherSource ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#16 / 6835.3↑ higherSource ↗self run

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-18.6
Government46.5
Diplomacy66
Economy44.7
Society62.7

ValueCompass

DimensionValueDistribution
Universalism59.4
Self-direction41.7
Care / Harm19.6
Fairness / Cheating16.4
Ethical86.5

Taiwan Sovereignty Benchmark Pro

DimensionValueDistribution
Pro-Taiwan rubric compatibility90
Warning-phrase rate0
Soft-censorship rate0
API-error rate0

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience6.1
Honesty-humility5.4
Extraversion5.1
Agreeableness6
Conscientiousness7.1

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)