← Models

Model profile

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Metadeveloper
2024-07-23release date
#302 / 346Safety rank
#128 / 662Freedom rank
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has an estimated Safety rank of #302; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #226–#314. Its behavior-only rank is #289; company governance moves the combined estimate to #302. Published Safety evidence spans 32 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AgentHarm (harm_score, #1 of 12); its weakest is Agent-SafetyBench (leak_sensitive_information, #16 of 16).

Freedom. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has an estimated Freedom rank of #128; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #114–#298. Published Freedom evidence spans 20 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is DSPSafeBench (score, #1 of 12); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #180 of 181).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#66 / 358↓0.4304Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1#12 / 20↑0.8667Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1#14 / 20↑0.6532Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchstale_f1#13 / 20↑0.6218Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1#9 / 20↑0.7449Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1#9 / 20↑0.656Source ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1#10 / 20↑0.7338Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchcompromise_availability#16 / 16↑12.8Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchharmful_vulnerable_code#14 / 16↑24.8Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchleak_sensitive_information#16 / 16↑10Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchphysical_harm#16 / 16↑11.2Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information#14 / 16↑74.8Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchproperty_loss#16 / 16↑12.4Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchspread_unsafe_information#15 / 16↑6.4Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchviolate_law_ethics#16 / 16↑6.8Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#42 / 48↑50Source ↗official
AgentHarmharm_score#1 / 12↓3.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#15 / 32↓18.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#15 / 32↓15.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#14 / 32↓7.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#16 / 32↓21.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#18 / 32↓14.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#16 / 32↓16Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#16 / 32↓12.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#13 / 32↓11.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#18 / 32↓24.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#13 / 32↓14.3Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#12 / 32↓10.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#15 / 32↓17.2Source ↗official
AIMS Safety-Classifier Competenceaverage_harmful_f1#9 / 11↑0.749Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#47 / 80↑0.623Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#94 / 122↑0.14Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#65 / 104↓52.74Source ↗official
Contextual MoralChoicehuman_agreement#16 / 22↑0.35Source ↗official
DSPSafeBenchscore#12 / 12↑61.51Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#114 / 270↑18.35Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#173 / 270↑83.91Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#138 / 270↑73.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#212 / 268↑92.07Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#65 / 80↑0.968Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#68 / 80↑0.785Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#61 / 80↑0.616Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#40 / 80↑0.988Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#48 / 80↑0.953Source ↗official
IndoBias-Pairs — parity-aware culturally grounded biasparity_score#16 / 26↑85.01Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#12 / 13↑3.11Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#37 / 39↓1.623Source ↗official
MedSafetyBenchmedical_safety_score#10 / 30↑93.28Source ↗official
MuPPET Contextual Privacymultiparty_contextual_privacy_score#6 / 7↑35.12Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#25 / 46↑0.98Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#38 / 66↑0.4415Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#60 / 70↑0.6381Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#62 / 70↑0.8306Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#26 / 67↑0.5881Source ↗official
PropensityBenchscore#10 / 14↓66.5Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#8 / 14↓0.658Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#9 / 14↓0.6Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#10 / 14↓0.724Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#12 / 51↓0.14Source ↗official
SYCON Benchfalse_presupposition_tof#11 / 11↑1.45Source ↗official
SYCON Benchunethical_queries_tof#10 / 11↑0.85Source ↗official
ThaiSafetyBenchsafety_score#17 / 18↑71.76Source ↗official
UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy#24 / 27↑0.57Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#7 / 25↓6.2Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information#3 / 16↓74.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#18 / 32↑18.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#18 / 32↑15.8Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#19 / 32↑7.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#17 / 32↑21.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#15 / 32↑14.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#16 / 32↑16Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#17 / 32↑12.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#19 / 32↑11.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#15 / 32↑24.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#19 / 32↑14.3Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#21 / 32↑10.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#18 / 32↑17.2Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#34 / 80↓0.623Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#40 / 104↑52.74Source ↗official
DSPSafeBenchscore#1 / 12↓61.51Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#98 / 270↓83.91Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#130 / 270↓73.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#57 / 268↓92.07Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#16 / 80↓0.968Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#20 / 80↓0.616Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#39 / 80↓0.988Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#48 / 80↑0.953Source ↗official
MedSafetyBenchmedical_safety_score#21 / 30↓93.28Source ↗official
MuPPET Contextual Privacymultiparty_contextual_privacy_score#2 / 7↓35.12Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#20 / 46↓0.98Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#9 / 70↓0.8306Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#42 / 67↓0.5881Source ↗official
Shelleducation_jsr#7 / 14↑0.658Source ↗official
Shellfinance_jsr#6 / 14↑0.6Source ↗official
Shellmanagement_jsr#5 / 14↑0.724Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#38 / 51↑0.14Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#180 / 181↑16.4Source ↗official
ThaiSafetyBenchsafety_score#2 / 18↓71.76Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#151 / 156↑0Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#113 / 156↑2Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#7 / 25↓6.2Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-15.3
Government43.6
Diplomacy66.2
Economy38.4
Society59.8

ValueCompass

DimensionValueDistribution
Universalism59.7
Self-direction45.7
Care / Harm24.7
Fairness / Cheating21.7
Ethical87.5