← Models

Model profile

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Metadeveloper
2024-07-23release date
#166 / 267overall rank
22eval lineages

Evidence summary

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has an estimated overall rank of #166; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #96–#205. Its behavior-only rank is #151; company governance moves the combined estimate to #166. Published evidence spans 22 evals and 6 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is PHARE (bias_resistance_diagnostic, #3 of 66); its weakest is BlueBench AttaQ-100 (attaq_harmlessness_reward_pct, #17 of 18).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#56 / 3110.5103↓ lowerSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchanswer_unknown_f1#11 / 200.87↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchfalse_premise_f1#7 / 200.7164↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchstale_f1#9 / 200.6419↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchsubjective_f1#10 / 200.7422↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_context_f1#3 / 200.7157↑ higherSource ↗official
AbstentionBenchunderspecified_intent_f1#14 / 200.7024↑ higherSource ↗official
Adversarial Robustnessscore#2 / 810↓ lowerSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchcompromise_availability#14 / 1619.6↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchharmful_vulnerable_code#6 / 1640.4↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchleak_sensitive_information#12 / 1625.2↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchphysical_harm#12 / 1624.4↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information#4 / 1698.8↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchproperty_loss#14 / 1627.6↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchspread_unsafe_information#6 / 1614.4↑ higherSource ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchviolate_law_ethics#5 / 1632.8↑ higherSource ↗official
AgentHarmharm_score#2 / 124.3↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#16 / 3220.4↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#21 / 3220.6↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#24 / 3214.5↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#21 / 3229.5↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#23 / 3219↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#23 / 3223.9↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#20 / 3217.9↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#22 / 3219.9↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#24 / 3235.2↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#21 / 3220.2↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#21 / 3215.7↓ lowerSource ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#23 / 3230.9↓ lowerSource ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#52 / 800.586↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#20 / 244.058↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#17 / 243.475↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#20 / 243.034↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#15 / 243.36↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#17 / 243.692↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#17 / 243.53↑ higherSource ↗official
BlueBench AttaQ-100attaq_harmlessness_reward_pct#17 / 1881.35↑ higherSource ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#44 / 10531.56↓ lowerSource ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#14 / 5214.36↓ lowerSource ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#19 / 4920.61↓ lowerSource ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#32 / 466.03↓ lowerSource ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#67 / 800.965↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#33 / 800.945↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#59 / 800.627↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#40 / 800.988↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#41 / 800.959↑ higherSource ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#23 / 5333.3↓ lowerSource ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#43 / 460.92↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#3 / 660.7523↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#55 / 700.674↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#57 / 700.8649↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#5 / 670.7655↑ higherSource ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#20 / 510.24↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchbiology_pvr#14 / 230.59↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchchemistry_pvr#13 / 230.468↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchmedicine_pvr#14 / 230.69↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchpharmacology_pvr#11 / 230.764↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchphysics_pvr#11 / 230.444↓ lowerSource ↗official
SOSBenchpsychology_pvr#14 / 230.568↓ lowerSource ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-24.2
Government45.1
Diplomacy69.2
Economy40.8
Society63.8

ValueCompass

DimensionValueDistribution
Universalism66.2
Self-direction48.4
Care / Harm18.5
Fairness / Cheating17.4
Ethical88.6