← Models

Model profile

Grok 4 Fast

xAIdeveloper
2025-09-19release date
#143 / 346Safety rank
#392 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Grok 4 Fast has an estimated Safety rank of #143; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #91–#250. Its behavior-only rank is #138; company governance moves the combined estimate to #143. Published Safety evidence spans 18 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is PHARE (bias_resistance_diagnostic, #2 of 66); its weakest is CAIS Risk Index (mask, #55 of 57).

Freedom. Grok 4 Fast has an estimated Freedom rank of #392; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #161–#557. Published Freedom evidence spans 6 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is PHARE (harm_resistance_diagnostic, #7 of 70); its weakest is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #53 of 69).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#133 / 358↓0.6827Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#14 / 24↓7.84Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#10 / 24↓35.58Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#20 / 48↑88.75Source ↗official
ANIMAscore#16 / 22↑0.6164Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Search Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#28 / 30↑1112.0Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#67 / 111↑1430.0Source ↗official
BrokenMathsycophancy#4 / 9↓40Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#22 / 54↓64.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#41 / 55↓68.7Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#46 / 51↓96.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#55 / 57↓70Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#3 / 51↓30.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#30 / 54↓19.8Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#43 / 104↓30.03Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#17 / 69↑19.5Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#43 / 50↓96.2Source ↗official
NESSiE Necessary Safety Benchmarksh_score#5 / 16↑92.02Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#2 / 66↑0.8026Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#62 / 70↑0.634Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#64 / 70↑0.8134Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#49 / 67↑0.412Source ↗official
UAVBench safety-critical decision recognitionethical_safety_critical_accuracy#14 / 27↑0.695Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#90 / 94↑80.05Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRbaseline_asr#11 / 24↑7.84Source ↗official
Adversarial Poetry — AILuminate Baseline and Poetry ASRpoetry_asr#15 / 24↑35.58Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#33 / 54↑64.1Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#62 / 104↑30.03Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#53 / 69↓19.5Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#7 / 70↓0.8134Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#19 / 67↓0.412Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_adherence_score#35 / 156↑5.25Source ↗official
UGI Leaderboard — base-model willingnesswillingness_direct_score#66 / 156↑3.5Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

UGI Political Values

DimensionValueDistribution
Political Lean-11.2
Government46
Diplomacy62.5
Economy40
Society63.8