Model profile
Glm 4.7
Evidence summary
Glm 4.7 has an estimated overall rank of #138; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #59–#254. Its behavior-only rank is #136; company governance moves the combined estimate to #138. Published evidence spans 6 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (eq_boundaries, #10 of 73); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #257 of 311).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗glm-4-7
- Hugging Face ↗zai-org/GLM-4.7
- OpenRouter ↗z-ai/glm-4.7
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #257 / 311 | 0.9029 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #82 / 105 | 63.96 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score | #21 / 54 | 27.46 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SABERoverall_safety_rate | #9 / 13 | 23.04 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SABERscenario_a_safety_rate | #7 / 13 | 28.03 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SABERscenario_b_safety_rate | #10 / 13 | 26.9 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SABERscenario_c_safety_rate | #10 / 13 | 14.41 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchadversarial | #31 / 73 | 82.93 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation | #45 / 73 | 82.44 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchanti_hallucination | #56 / 73 | 85.86 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Bencheq_boundaries | #10 / 73 | 71.35 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SM-Benchoverfit | #35 / 73 | 73.77 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #33 / 102 | 6.88 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #37 / 102 | 4.42 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #41 / 102 | 4.7 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #77 / 102 | 2.42 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official |
Values evaluations
Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.