← Models

Model profile

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Googledeveloper
2026-03-03release date
#202 / 346Safety rank
#218 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has an estimated Safety rank of #202; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #122–#243. Its behavior-only rank is #215; company governance moves the combined estimate to #202. Published Safety evidence spans 27 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeciEval (belief_animal_sentience, #1 of 131); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (hate, #31 of 31).

Freedom. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has an estimated Freedom rank of #218; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #127–#355. Published Freedom evidence spans 9 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (overfit, #2 of 92); its weakest is SM-Bench (adversarial, #90 of 92).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#209 / 358↓0.8266Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#28 / 31↓72.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#26 / 31↓82.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#31 / 31↓76.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#27 / 31↓86.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#21 / 31↓68.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#27 / 31↓91.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#24 / 31↓78.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#29 / 31↓87Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#26 / 31↓64.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#24 / 31↓71.47Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#30 / 31↓80.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#27 / 31↓88.9Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#30 / 111↑1449.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#101 / 122↑0.11Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#12 / 49↓45.4Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#45 / 54↓89.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#45 / 55↓72.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#45 / 51↓95.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#51 / 57↓55.8Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#36 / 51↓51.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#15 / 54↓15.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#15 / 16↓66.8Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#8 / 16↑25.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#14 / 16↓8.5Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#14 / 16↓38.6Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#12 / 16↓34.4Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#40 / 50↓69.4Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#35 / 50↓65.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#44 / 50↓80.73Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#41 / 50↓69.77Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#39 / 50↓73.97Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#40 / 50↓78.43Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#47 / 60↓51.05Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#11 / 59↓2.15Source ↗official
Humanity's Last Exam RMS calibration error (Scale Labs)calibrationError#35 / 42↓83Source ↗official
KIDBench Implicit Child Cueimplicit_child_cue_total_mean#3 / 13↑4.27Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#42 / 50↓95.8Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#21 / 45↓7.633Source ↗self run
MANTAAWMS#10 / 12↑0.401Source ↗official
MANTAAWVS#12 / 12↑0.309Source ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#45 / 53↓51.6Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#37 / 66↑0.4457Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#19 / 70↑0.8057Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#13 / 70↑0.9694Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#37 / 67↑0.4772Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#14 / 19↑0.02979Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#2 / 92↑91.71Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#60 / 92↑82.44Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#42 / 92↑94.76Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#40 / 92↑66.85Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#2 / 92↑97.81Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#1 / 131↑7Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#56 / 131↓4.46Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#69 / 131↓4.75Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#128 / 131↓3.225Source ↗official
StereoTales Harmful Associationsbenign_significant_association_score#14 / 23↑85.61Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#34 / 92↑30.13Source ↗self run
Vals AI Cheating Auditterminal_bench_cheating_shortcut_evidence_rate_pct#6 / 14↓1.124Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#36 / 94↑91.8Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#13 / 25↓8.3Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#13 / 23↑38Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#4 / 31↑72.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#6 / 31↑82.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#1 / 31↑76.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#5 / 31↑86.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#11 / 31↑68.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#5 / 31↑91.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#7 / 31↑78.7Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#2 / 31↑87Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#5 / 31↑64.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#8 / 31↑71.47Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#2 / 31↑80.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#4 / 31↑88.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#10 / 54↑89.8Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#9 / 16↓25.7Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#3 / 16↑8.5Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#14 / 60↑51.05Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#11 / 59↓2.15Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#58 / 70↓0.9694Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#31 / 67↓0.4772Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#90 / 92↓91.71Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#40 / 92↑66.85Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#2 / 92↑97.81Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#14 / 181↑88.4Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#13 / 25↓8.3Source ↗official
Vigil Mental Health Safetyoverall_score#10 / 23↓38Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

The Economist World Values Survey Cultural Map

DimensionValueDistribution
Survival ↔ Self-expression3.82
Traditional ↔ Secular0.967