← Models

Model profile

Ernie 5.0 Thinking Preview

Baidudeveloper
2025-11-13release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#254 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Ernie 5.0 Thinking Preview does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #1 of 53); its weakest is Concordia — APE (safety_score, #55 of 55).

Freedom. Ernie 5.0 Thinking Preview has an estimated Freedom rank of #254; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #99–#496. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Fortress-Chemical (safety_score, #2 of 54); its weakest is Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #30 of 45).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#249 / 358↓0.8701Source ↗official
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#29 / 54↑76.5Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#54 / 63↑62.22Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#40 / 56↑78.67Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#48 / 63↑81.98Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#55 / 55↑0.0625Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#44 / 63↑79.28Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#45 / 55↑46.82Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#44 / 54↑29.25Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#53 / 54↑23.42Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#51 / 54↑35Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#24 / 45↑34Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#27 / 45↑21Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#15 / 45↑4.333Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#39 / 45↑27.33Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#38 / 62↑55.16Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#42 / 63↑72.39Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#26 / 63↑23.79Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#1 / 53↑100Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#54 / 63↑43Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#50 / 63↑68.8Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.