← Models

Model profile

Yi 1.5 9B Chat

01.AIdeveloper
2024-05-13release date
#250 / 346Safety rank
#530 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Yi 1.5 9B Chat has an estimated Safety rank of #250; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #105–#303. Its behavior-only rank is #252; company governance moves the combined estimate to #250. Published Safety evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #40 of 268); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #233 of 270).

Freedom. Yi 1.5 9B Chat has an estimated Freedom rank of #530; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #326–#661. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #37 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #228 of 268).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
ChineseSafescore#8 / 22↑60.35Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#158 / 270↑14.73Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#108 / 270↑88.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#233 / 270↑40.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#40 / 268↑99Source ↗official
FinEval Financial Security Knowledgefinancial_security_accuracy_pct#13 / 19↑71.4Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#162 / 270↓88.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#37 / 270↓40.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#228 / 268↓99Source ↗official