← Models

Model profile

Seed 2.1 Pro

ByteDancedeveloper
Not rankedSafety rank
#429 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Seed 2.1 Pro does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — SOSBench-Bio (safety_score, #6 of 63); its weakest is Opposite-Narrator Sycophancy (sycophancy_rate_pct, #22 of 24).

Freedom. Seed 2.1 Pro has an estimated Freedom rank of #429; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #273–#571. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #18 of 63); its weakest is Concordia — SOSBench-Chem (safety_score, #57 of 63).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#20 / 54↑86.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#29 / 63↑85.93Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#28 / 56↑89.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#26 / 63↑95.27Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#31 / 55↑18.38Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#39 / 63↑81.67Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#41 / 55↑48.64Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#28 / 54↑52.79Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#27 / 54↑55.52Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#31 / 54↑57.33Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#27 / 45↑32.44Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#26 / 45↑25.17Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#13 / 45↑4.667Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#33 / 45↑38.67Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#52 / 62↑47.71Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#39 / 63↑75.08Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#45 / 63↑11.01Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#47 / 53↑78Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#6 / 63↑98.8Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#6 / 63↑95.8Source ↗official
Opposite-Narrator Sycophancysycophancy_rate_pct#22 / 24↓14.6Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.