← Models

Model profile

Sarvam 1

Sarvam AIdeveloper
Not rankedSafety rank
#211 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Sarvam 1 does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #23 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #237 of 270).

Freedom. Sarvam 1 has an estimated Freedom rank of #211; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #51–#621. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #33 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #153 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#23 / 270↑47.55Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#114 / 270↑88.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#237 / 270↑39.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#207 / 268↑92.88Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#153 / 270↓88.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#33 / 270↓39.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#62 / 268↓92.88Source ↗official