← Models

Model profile

OLMo 3.1 32B Think

Ai2developer
2025-12-10release date
#286 / 346Safety rank
#641 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. OLMo 3.1 32B Think has an estimated Safety rank of #286; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #102–#331. Its behavior-only rank is #292; company governance moves the combined estimate to #286. Published Safety evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 2 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #124 of 358); its weakest is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #103 of 111).

Freedom. OLMo 3.1 32B Think has an estimated Freedom rank of #641; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #456–#660. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #163 of 181); its weakest is SpeechMap model completion (complete_pct, #163 of 181).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#124 / 358↓0.6629Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#103 / 111↑1392.0Source ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#37 / 54↑25.83Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#163 / 181↑32.5Source ↗official