← Models

Model profile

o1 Preview

OpenAIdeveloper
2024-09-12release date
#50 / 346Safety rank
#614 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. o1 Preview has an estimated Safety rank of #50; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #4–#194. Its behavior-only rank is #49; company governance moves the combined estimate to #50. Published Safety evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #14 of 270); its weakest is SORRY-Bench (avg, #22 of 51).

Freedom. o1 Preview has an estimated Freedom rank of #614; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #378–#655. Published Freedom evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SORRY-Bench (avg, #30 of 51); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #256 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#21 / 52↓18.32Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#78 / 270↑23.51Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#14 / 270↑95.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#24 / 270↑98.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#91 / 268↑97.64Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#11 / 39↓0.8621Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#22 / 51↓0.25Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#256 / 270↓95.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#241 / 270↓98.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#176 / 268↓97.64Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#30 / 51↑0.25Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#153 / 181↑35.8Source ↗official