Model profile
Nova Micro
Amazondeveloper
#210 / 267overall rank
4eval lineages
Evidence summary
Nova Micro has an estimated overall rank of #210; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #60–#245. Its behavior-only rank is #213; company governance moves the combined estimate to #210. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #81 of 311); its weakest is SpeciEval (land_animal_4ns, #102 of 102).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗nova-micro
- Official model documentation ↗Family-level model document · amazon · first party
Published eval results
Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Better | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #81 / 311 | 0.6497 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate | #84 / 105 | 64.91 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #181 / 260 | 12.92 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #88 / 260 | 90.33 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #98 / 260 | 79.44 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #114 / 258 | 97.05 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience | #30 / 102 | 6.9 | ↑ higher | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns | #102 / 102 | 5.88 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns | #102 / 102 | 6.3 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official | |
| SpeciEvalspeciesism | #68 / 102 | 2.25 | ↓ lower | Source ↗official |