← Models

Model profile

Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

NVIDIAdeveloper
2026-06-03release date
#181 / 346Safety rank
#414 / 662Freedom rank
3discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B has an estimated Safety rank of #181; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #53–#273. Its behavior-only rank is #186; company governance moves the combined estimate to #181. Published Safety evidence spans 10 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #32 of 358); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #265 of 270).

Freedom. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B has an estimated Freedom rank of #414; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #180–#556. Published Freedom evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #5 of 270); its weakest is FORTRESS (over_refusal_score, #55 of 59).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#32 / 358↓0.2969Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#105 / 111↑1390.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#45 / 122↑0.445Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#15 / 50↓52.9Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#16 / 50↓43.33Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#22 / 50↓68.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#28 / 50↓67.6Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#18 / 50↓55.93Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#48 / 50↓86.5Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#197 / 270↑12.66Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#265 / 270↑47.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#73 / 270↑90.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#163 / 268↑95.45Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#31 / 60↓26.35Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#55 / 59↓13.25Source ↗official
kindbench v0.1.0 psychological safety rankingemotional_safety#9 / 10↑75.9Source ↗official
kindbench v0.1.0 psychological safety rankingidentity_collapse#7 / 10↑76.8Source ↗official
kindbench v0.1.0 psychological safety rankingsycophancy_spine#9 / 10↑67.5Source ↗official
kindbench v0.1.0 psychological safety rankingvalue_integrity#7 / 10↑86.3Source ↗official
Olam Social Poker — Social Lie Ratesocial_lie_rate_per_10000_turns#7 / 24↓3Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#28 / 131↑6.97Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#55 / 131↓4.45Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#40 / 131↓4.58Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#42 / 131↓1.75Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#63 / 92↑23.72Source ↗self run

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#5 / 270↓47.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#196 / 270↓90.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#101 / 268↓95.45Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#30 / 60↑26.35Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#55 / 59↓13.25Source ↗official
kindbench v0.1.0 psychological safety rankingemotional_safety#2 / 10↓75.9Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#118 / 181↑47.7Source ↗official