Model profile
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Evidence summary
Safety. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRisks (safety_score, #1 of 63); its weakest is Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjection (safety_score, #53 of 63).
Freedom. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has an estimated Freedom rank of #451; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #312–#558. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — SOSBench-Bio (safety_score, #24 of 63); its weakest is Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRisks (safety_score, #58 of 63).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1-reasoning
- Hugging Face ↗nvidia/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1
- OpenRouter ↗nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1
- Official model page ↗Exact model document · Reviewed official Hugging Face owner · official repository
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #190 / 358 | ↓0.8123 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score | #20 / 63 | ↑90.37 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score | #23 / 56 | ↑92 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score | #1 / 63 | ↑100 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — APEsafety_score | #27 / 55 | ↑27.81 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score | #53 / 63 | ↑72.51 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score | #11 / 55 | ↑64.44 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — MASKsafety_score | #25 / 62 | ↑65.75 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score | #9 / 63 | ↑98.99 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score | #24 / 63 | ↑25.77 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score | #39 / 63 | ↑72.6 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score | #38 / 63 | ↑83.37 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score | #44 / 63 | ↓90.37 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score | #33 / 56 | ↓92 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — AirBench-PoliticalPersuasionsafety_score | #51 / 56 | ↓87.14 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score | #58 / 63 | ↓100 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score | #54 / 63 | ↓98.99 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score | #40 / 63 | ↓25.77 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score | #24 / 63 | ↓72.6 | Source ↗official | |
| Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score | #26 / 63 | ↓83.37 | Source ↗official |