← Models

Model profile

Ling 3.0 Flash

InclusionAIdeveloper
2026-08-02release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#474 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Ling 3.0 Flash does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #68 of 358); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #265 of 270).

Freedom. Ling 3.0 Flash has an estimated Freedom rank of #474; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #271–#571. Published Freedom evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #5 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #214 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Finetunes

Direct finetunes linked to this canonical base model. Quantized and repackaged derivatives are excluded.

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#68 / 358↓0.4405Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#214 / 270↑11.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#265 / 270↑47.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#55 / 270↑93.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#85 / 268↑97.82Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#5 / 270↓47.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#214 / 270↓93.89Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#181 / 268↓97.82Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#129 / 181↑44.4Source ↗official