← Models

Model profile

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

InclusionAIdeveloper
2026-09-04release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#364 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Ling 3.0 Flash VL does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #13 of 358); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #263 of 270).

Freedom. Ling 3.0 Flash VL has an estimated Freedom rank of #364; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #220–#471. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #7 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #217 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#13 / 358↓0.2205Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#241 / 270↑9.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#263 / 270↑47.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#50 / 270↑94.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#102 / 268↑97.27Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#7 / 270↓47.83Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#217 / 270↓94.44Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#161 / 268↓97.27Source ↗official