← Models

Model profile

Ling 2.6 Flash

InclusionAIdeveloper
2026-04-21release date
#299 / 346Safety rank
#609 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Ling 2.6 Flash has an estimated Safety rank of #299; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #141–#340. Its behavior-only rank is #304; company governance moves the combined estimate to #299. Published Safety evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 5 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SABER (scenario_c_safety_rate, #4 of 13); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #353 of 358).

Freedom. Ling 2.6 Flash has an estimated Freedom rank of #609; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #380–#661. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (adversarial, #25 of 92); its weakest is SM-Bench (overfit, #85 of 92).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#353 / 358↓0.9672Source ↗official
SABERoverall_safety_rate#7 / 13↑24.63Source ↗official
SABERscenario_a_safety_rate#10 / 13↑25.79Source ↗official
SABERscenario_b_safety_rate#8 / 13↑30.66Source ↗official
SABERscenario_c_safety_rate#4 / 13↑18.68Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#64 / 92↑79.51Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#81 / 92↑73.21Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#74 / 92↑85.86Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#73 / 92↑56.46Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#85 / 92↑26.23Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#77 / 92↑19.23Source ↗self run

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
SM-Benchadversarial#25 / 92↓79.51Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#73 / 92↑56.46Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#85 / 92↑26.23Source ↗official