← Models

Model profile

LFM2 700M

Liquid AIdeveloper
2025-07-10release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#191 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. LFM2 700M does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #67 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #205 of 270).

Freedom. LFM2 700M has an estimated Freedom rank of #191; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #68–#472. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #64 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #128 of 268).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#67 / 270↑26.36Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#205 / 270↑79Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#184 / 270↑55.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#141 / 268↑96.21Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#64 / 270↓79Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#82 / 270↓55.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#128 / 268↓96.21Source ↗official