← Models

Model profile

Jamba Mini 1.6

AI21 Labsdeveloper
Not rankedSafety rank
#165 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Jamba Mini 1.6 does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #62 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #240 of 270).

Freedom. Jamba Mini 1.6 has an estimated Freedom rank of #165; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #74–#441. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #27 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #206 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#197 / 270↑12.66Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#62 / 270↑91.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#240 / 270↑38.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#221 / 268↑91.23Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#206 / 270↓91.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#27 / 270↓38.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#47 / 268↓91.23Source ↗official