Model profile
Jamba 1.7 Mini
Evidence summary
Safety. Jamba 1.7 Mini has an estimated Safety rank of #331; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #293–#336. Its behavior-only rank is #340; company governance moves the combined estimate to #331. Published Safety evidence spans 3 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (bias_attack_non_success_rate, #116 of 270); its weakest is AA-Omniscience (hallucination_rate, #343 of 358).
Freedom. Jamba 1.7 Mini has an estimated Freedom rank of #82; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #9–#444. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #42 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #54 of 270).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Artificial Analysis ↗jamba-1-7-mini
- Official model page ↗Family-level model document · ai21 · first party
- Release source ↗curated outward evidence
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate | #343 / 358 | ↓0.951 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #116 / 270 | ↑18.09 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #217 / 270 | ↑75.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #228 / 270 | ↑42.22 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #227 / 268 | ↑90.5 | Source ↗official | |
| Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate | #84 / 94 | ↑85.3 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #54 / 270 | ↓75.33 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #42 / 270 | ↓42.22 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #42 / 268 | ↓90.5 | Source ↗official |