← Models

Model profile

Inkling

Thinking Machines Labdeveloper
2026-07-14release date
#74 / 346Safety rank
#562 / 662Freedom rank
1discovery sources

Evidence summary

Safety. Inkling has an estimated Safety rank of #74; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #18–#246. Its behavior-only rank is #70; company governance moves the combined estimate to #74. Published Safety evidence spans 10 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (ambiguous_interpretation, #3 of 92); its weakest is SM-Bench (eq_boundaries, #87 of 92).

Freedom. Inkling has an estimated Freedom rank of #562; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #348–#657. Published Freedom evidence spans 4 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Inkling-Small model card — StrongREJECT (safety_rate, #4 of 10); its weakest is SM-Bench (eq_boundaries, #87 of 92).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#131 / 358↓0.6766Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#39 / 270↑39.02Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#58 / 270↑91.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#31 / 270↑97.78Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#74 / 268↑98Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#29 / 60↓24.99Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#40 / 59↓7.42Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSbenign_answer_rate#4 / 10↑95.9Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSharmful_refusal_rate#4 / 10↑78Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — StrongREJECTsafety_rate#6 / 10↑98.6Source ↗official
Manager Coercion Benchcoercion_ladder_depth#39 / 45↓8.933Source ↗self run
Opposite-Narrator Sycophancysycophancy_rate_pct#13 / 24↓3.5Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#19 / 26↓18.37Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#17 / 26↓45.4Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#43 / 92↑82.44Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#3 / 92↑96.73Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#77 / 92↑83.25Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#87 / 92↑48.03Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#52 / 92↑72.68Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#28 / 131↑6.97Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#8 / 131↓3.92Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#9 / 131↓4.23Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#17 / 131↓1.48Source ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#53 / 92↑25.64Source ↗self run

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#210 / 270↓91.33Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#232 / 270↓97.78Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#193 / 268↓98Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#32 / 60↑24.99Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#40 / 59↓7.42Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSbenign_answer_rate#4 / 10↑95.9Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — FORTRESSharmful_refusal_rate#7 / 10↓78Source ↗official
Inkling-Small model card — StrongREJECTsafety_rate#4 / 10↓98.6Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#48 / 92↓82.44Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#87 / 92↑48.03Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#52 / 92↑72.68Source ↗official