← Models

Model profile

Hunyuan 2.0 Think

Tencentdeveloper
2025-11-09release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#375 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Hunyuan 2.0 Think does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #1 of 53); its weakest is Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulation (safety_score, #39 of 45).

Freedom. Hunyuan 2.0 Think has an estimated Freedom rank of #375; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #235–#459. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulation (safety_score, #7 of 45); its weakest is Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #61 of 63).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#33 / 54↑72.17Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#32 / 63↑83.7Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#31 / 56↑85.33Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#33 / 63↑92.12Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#38 / 55↑11.77Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#41 / 63↑80.48Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#23 / 55↑58.75Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#35 / 54↑41.89Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#34 / 54↑44.77Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#37 / 54↑51Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#39 / 45↑17.33Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#38 / 45↑12.67Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#20 / 45↑3.333Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#28 / 45↑50.67Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#50 / 62↑48.02Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#20 / 63↑93.27Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#3 / 63↑56.39Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#1 / 53↑100Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#35 / 63↑77Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#21 / 63↑91.2Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.