← Models

Model profile

GPT 5.4 Mini

OpenAIdeveloper
2026-03-17release date
#75 / 346Safety rank
#642 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. GPT 5.4 Mini has an estimated Safety rank of #75; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #32–#224. Its behavior-only rank is #86; company governance moves the combined estimate to #75. Published Safety evidence spans 23 eval lineages and 6 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting) (factuality_bt_rating, #1 of 111); its weakest is SM-Bench (overfit, #90 of 92).

Freedom. GPT 5.4 Mini has an estimated Freedom rank of #642; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #473–#652. Published Freedom evidence spans 7 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SM-Bench (adversarial, #14 of 92); its weakest is Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5 (intellectual_property, #31 of 31).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#283 / 358↓0.8985Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#7 / 31↓19.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#3 / 31↓26.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#4 / 31↓28.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#10 / 31↓33.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#1 / 31↓14.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#3 / 31↓23.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#2 / 31↓23.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#4 / 31↓19.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#6 / 31↓27.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#3 / 31↓22.48Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#3 / 31↓8.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#3 / 31↓23.9Source ↗official
Arena Factuality — Text Arena (factuality-only weighting)factuality_bt_rating#1 / 111↑1497.0Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#65 / 122↑0.3167Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#27 / 49↓74.3Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#15 / 54↓60Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#29 / 55↓55.2Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#44 / 51↓95.6Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#25 / 57↓15.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexpolitical_manipulation#47 / 51↓61.1Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#13 / 54↓15.4Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#26 / 104↓9.571Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldelusional_prevalence_pct#1 / 16↓11.2Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#2 / 16↑61.3Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#1 / 16↓0Source ↗official
DelusionEvalrelationship_prevalence_pct#1 / 16↓7.1Source ↗official
DelusionEvalsycophancy_prevalence_pct#2 / 16↓15.2Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbasaglia_score#14 / 50↓49.13Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchbaudrillard_score#12 / 50↓38.87Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchhuxley_score#11 / 50↓45.1Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchlaguardia_score#11 / 50↓52.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchorwell_score#12 / 50↓41.8Source ↗official
DystopiaBenchpetrov_score#9 / 50↓39.6Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitybaseline_cheat_propensity_pct#5 / 22↓21.7Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitysevere_anti_cheat_cheat_propensity_pct#17 / 22↓13Source ↗official
Every Model Cheats — Cybench Cheat Propensitystandard_anti_cheat_cheat_propensity_pct#10 / 22↓13Source ↗official
Governance Decay under Passive Context Compactiongovernance_retention_score#5 / 7↑59Source ↗official
JuICE Cultural-Error Span Detectionf1#9 / 10↑0.3079Source ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#41 / 50↓95.6Source ↗official
Pander Scoreconversational_absolute_pander_score#18 / 26↓16.43Source ↗official
Pander Scoreinstructional_absolute_pander_score#15 / 26↓38.82Source ↗official
RefusalBenchyouden_j#5 / 19↑0.3787Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#79 / 92↑76.83Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#52 / 92↑84.08Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#81 / 92↑80.23Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#38 / 92↑67.28Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#90 / 92↑15.3Source ↗official
Vals AI Cheating Auditterminal_bench_cheating_shortcut_evidence_rate_pct#2 / 14↓0.3745Source ↗official
Vectara HHEM Factual Consistencyfactual_consistency_rate#16 / 94↑94.5Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#17 / 25↓9.9Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5child_sexual_exploitation#25 / 31↑19.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5defamation#29 / 31↑26.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5hate#28 / 31↑28.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5indiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#21 / 31↑33.3Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5intellectual_property#31 / 31↑14.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5non_violent_crimes#29 / 31↑23.9Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5privacy#29 / 31↑23.4Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sex_related_crimes#28 / 31↑19.6Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5sexual_content#26 / 31↑27.1Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5specialized_advice#29 / 31↑22.48Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5suicide_self_harm#29 / 31↑8.5Source ↗official
Adversarial Humanities Benchmark (AHB) — Table 5violent_crimes#28 / 31↑23.9Source ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#40 / 54↑60Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#79 / 104↑9.571Source ↗official
DelusionEvaldiscourages_harm_prevalence_pct#15 / 16↓61.3Source ↗official
DelusionEvalfacilitates_harm_prevalence_pct#15 / 16↑0Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#14 / 92↓76.83Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#38 / 92↑67.28Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#90 / 92↑15.3Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#170 / 181↑29.4Source ↗official
VETO Misfired Alignmentmisfired_alignment_rate_pct#17 / 25↓9.9Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

Agent-ValueBench Moral Foundations (MFT08)

Agent-ValueBench HEXACO

DimensionValueDistribution
Openness to experience5.5
Honesty-humility5.3
Extraversion6.1
Agreeableness6.5
Conscientiousness7.3

Agent-ValueBench Schwartz Basic Values (PVQ40)