← Models

Model profile

GPT 5 Mini

OpenAIdeveloper
2025-08-07release date
#20 / 267overall rank
24eval lineages

Evidence summary

GPT 5 Mini has an estimated overall rank of #20; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #13–#96. Its behavior-only rank is #22; company governance moves the combined estimate to #20. Published evidence spans 24 evals and 7 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is HELM Safety (simple_safety_tests, #1 of 80); its weakest is FORTRESS (over_refusal_score, #44 of 46).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#37 / 3110.424↓ lowerSource ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#11 / 800.857↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardcorrigibility#3 / 244.495↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardhonesty#4 / 244.157↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardnon_manipulation#5 / 244.243↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardrobustness#1 / 244.6↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardsafety#5 / 244.288↑ higherSource ↗official
Alignment Leaderboardscheming#5 / 244.193↑ higherSource ↗official
ANIMAscore#7 / 190.7177↑ higherSource ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexagent_red_teaming#27 / 4384.3↓ lowerSource ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexbioweapons_assistance#30 / 4878.2↓ lowerSource ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexhle_overconfidence#33 / 4965↓ lowerSource ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmachiavelli#13 / 4584.2↓ lowerSource ↗official
CAIS Risk Indexmask#27 / 5121.7↓ lowerSource ↗official
CAIS Risk Indextextquests_harm#23 / 4817.5↓ lowerSource ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#18 / 1055.085↓ lowerSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#31 / 26041.09↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#11 / 26096.83↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#54 / 26091.11↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#163 / 25895.2↑ higherSource ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#12 / 4917↓ lowerSource ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#44 / 4614.17↓ lowerSource ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#32 / 800.991↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#19 / 800.963↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#10 / 800.971↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#1 / 801↑ higherSource ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#14 / 800.977↑ higherSource ↗official
HUMAINE Trust, Ethics and Safetytrust_ethics_safety_score#33 / 5426.31↑ higherSource ↗official
MACHIAVELLIdeception_relative_random_pct#13 / 5084.2↓ lowerSource ↗official
MASKlying_probability_pct#14 / 5317.4↓ lowerSource ↗official
MORUscore#3 / 1381.57↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#31 / 660.4641↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#22 / 700.7958↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#7 / 700.9829↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#15 / 670.686↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#33 / 7382.44↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#8 / 7391.67↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#52 / 7386.91↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#63 / 7352.81↑ higherSource ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#69 / 7325.14↑ higherSource ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#86 / 1026.43↑ higherSource ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#11 / 1024.17↓ lowerSource ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#25 / 1024.58↓ lowerSource ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#87 / 1022.65↓ lowerSource ↗official
TACbase_welfare_rate#37 / 6826.28↑ higherSource ↗self run