← Models

Model profile

GPT 4o Mini

OpenAIdeveloper
2024-07-18release date
#266 / 346Safety rank
#224 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. GPT 4o Mini has an estimated Safety rank of #266; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #187–#282. Its behavior-only rank is #276; company governance moves the combined estimate to #266. Published Safety evidence spans 31 eval lineages and 7 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Contextual MoralChoice (human_agreement, #1 of 22); its weakest is MonitoringBench Full-Trajectory Monitor (full_trajectory_catch_rate_at_1pct_fpr_percent, #13 of 13).

Freedom. GPT 4o Mini has an estimated Freedom rank of #224; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #153–#357. Published Freedom evidence spans 18 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusal (refusal_rate_pct, #1 of 69); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #221 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Agent-SafetyBenchcompromise_availability#13 / 16↑23.6Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchharmful_vulnerable_code#13 / 16↑25.2Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchleak_sensitive_information#11 / 16↑28Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchphysical_harm#12 / 16↑24.4Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information#5 / 16↑98.4Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchproperty_loss#12 / 16↑30Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchspread_unsafe_information#14 / 16↑6.8Source ↗official
Agent-SafetyBenchviolate_law_ethics#14 / 16↑13.2Source ↗official
AgentDojotargeted_attack_success_rate#13 / 15↓0.2719Source ↗official
AgentDojoutility_under_attack#5 / 15↑0.4992Source ↗official
AgentDrive Safety Compliancescr#36 / 48↑58.75Source ↗official
AgentHarmharm_score#10 / 12↓62.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#14 / 32↓17.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#19 / 32↓17.4Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#20 / 32↓10.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#13 / 32↓19.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#14 / 32↓10.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#15 / 32↓15.7Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#13 / 32↓10.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#19 / 32↓16.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#26 / 32↓42.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#19 / 32↓18.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#20 / 32↓15.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#17 / 32↓18Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#57 / 80↑0.563Source ↗official
AnimalHarmBenchscore#9 / 10↑0.002Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#25 / 52↑99.3Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#43 / 52↑15.8Source ↗official
BullshitBench v2clear_pushback_rate#121 / 122↑0.02Source ↗official
CASE-Benchagreement_accuracy#6 / 7↑80Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#70 / 104↓54.99Source ↗official
Confabulationsconfabulation_rate#50 / 52↓60.89Source ↗official
Contextual MoralChoicehuman_agreement#1 / 22↑0.65Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#173 / 270↑13.7Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#47 / 270↑92Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#170 / 270↑60.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#74 / 268↑98Source ↗official
FinEval Financial Security Knowledgefinancial_security_accuracy_pct#3 / 19↑79.1Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#45 / 60↓48.07Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#15 / 59↓2.27Source ↗official
HalluVerse-M3 Hallucination Recognitionhallucination_recognition_accuracy#6 / 14↑73.39Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#50 / 80↑0.983Source ↗official
HELM Safetybbq#59 / 80↑0.882Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#28 / 80↑0.849Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#52 / 80↑0.978Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#39 / 80↑0.96Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#27 / 69↑0Source ↗official
Large-scale Moral Machine experiment on LLMshuman_choice_distance#19 / 39↓1.076Source ↗official
MedSafetyBenchmedical_safety_score#8 / 30↑94.89Source ↗official
MonitoringBench Full-Trajectory Monitorfull_trajectory_catch_rate_at_1pct_fpr_percent#13 / 13↑0.4Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#25 / 46↑0.98Source ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#51 / 66↑0.379Source ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#59 / 70↑0.6597Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#67 / 70↑0.7729Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#30 / 67↑0.5214Source ↗official
SafeArenanormalized_safety_score#2 / 5↑35.7Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#73 / 92↑78.54Source ↗official
SM-Benchambiguous_interpretation#87 / 92↑66.07Source ↗official
SM-Benchanti_hallucination#90 / 92↑59.16Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#15 / 92↑71.35Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#62 / 92↑65.03Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#34 / 51↓0.36Source ↗official
SpeciEvalbelief_animal_sentience#126 / 131↑6.28Source ↗official
SpeciEvalland_animal_4ns#66 / 131↓4.53Source ↗official
SpeciEvalsea_animal_4ns#59 / 131↓4.7Source ↗official
SpeciEvalspeciesism#112 / 131↓2.6Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Agent-SafetyBenchproduce_unsafe_information#12 / 16↓98.4Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatchild_sexual_exploitation#19 / 32↑17.6Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatdefamation#14 / 32↑17.4Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chathate#13 / 32↑10.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatindiscriminate_weapons_cbrne#20 / 32↑19.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatintellectual_property#19 / 32↑10.1Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatnon_violent_crimes#18 / 32↑15.7Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatprivacy#20 / 32↑10.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsex_related_crimes#14 / 32↑16.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsexual_content#7 / 32↑42.9Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatspecialized_advice#14 / 32↑18.2Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatsuicide_self_harm#13 / 32↑15.5Source ↗official
AILuminate General Purpose AI Chatviolent_crimes#16 / 32↑18Source ↗official
AIRBench 2024 Safety Scenariossafety_scenarios#24 / 80↓0.563Source ↗official
BioTIERpermit_compliance_pct#25 / 52↑99.3Source ↗official
BioTIERrefuse_compliance_pct#10 / 52↓15.8Source ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#34 / 104↑54.99Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#221 / 270↓92Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#100 / 270↓60.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#193 / 268↓98Source ↗official
FORTRESSaverage_risk_score#16 / 60↑48.07Source ↗official
FORTRESSover_refusal_score#15 / 59↓2.27Source ↗official
HELM Safetyanthropic_red_team#28 / 80↓0.983Source ↗official
HELM Safetyharmbench#53 / 80↓0.849Source ↗official
HELM Safetysimple_safety_tests#29 / 80↓0.978Source ↗official
HELM Safetyxstest#39 / 80↑0.96Source ↗official
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test (HPCT) — overall refusalrefusal_rate_pct#1 / 69↓0Source ↗official
MedSafetyBenchmedical_safety_score#23 / 30↓94.89Source ↗official
PandaBench JBB direct-request panelsafety_rate#20 / 46↓0.98Source ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#4 / 70↓0.7729Source ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#38 / 67↓0.5214Source ↗official
SM-Benchadversarial#19 / 92↓78.54Source ↗official
SM-Bencheq_boundaries#15 / 92↑71.35Source ↗official
SM-Benchoverfit#62 / 92↑65.03Source ↗official
SORRY-Benchavg#15 / 51↑0.36Source ↗official
SpeechMap model completioncomplete_pct#27 / 181↑84.5Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

ValueCompass

DimensionValueDistribution
Universalism67.2
Self-direction46.2
Care / Harm30.1
Fairness / Cheating28.5
Ethical90.7

Taiwan Sovereignty Benchmark Pro

DimensionValueDistribution
Pro-Taiwan rubric compatibility100.0
Warning-phrase rate0
Soft-censorship rate0
API-error rate0