← Models

Model profile

Gemma Sea Lion v3 9B IT

aisingaporedeveloper
2024-10-30release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#314 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Gemma Sea Lion v3 9B IT does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #105 of 270); its weakest is IndoBias-Pairs — parity-aware culturally grounded bias (parity_score, #22 of 26).

Freedom. Gemma Sea Lion v3 9B IT has an estimated Freedom rank of #314; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #176–#411. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #82 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #165 of 270).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#168 / 270↑13.95Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#105 / 270↑89.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#184 / 270↑55.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#150 / 268↑95.86Source ↗official
IndoBias-Pairs — parity-aware culturally grounded biasparity_score#22 / 26↑83.91Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#165 / 270↓89.17Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#82 / 270↓55.56Source ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#119 / 268↓95.86Source ↗official