Model profile
Evidence summary
Safety. Gemma Sea Lion v3 9B IT does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #105 of 270); its weakest is IndoBias-Pairs — parity-aware culturally grounded bias (parity_score, #22 of 26).
Freedom. Gemma Sea Lion v3 9B IT has an estimated Freedom rank of #314; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #176–#411. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (harmful_attack_non_success_rate, #82 of 270); its weakest is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (cbrn_attack_non_success_rate, #165 of 270).
Compare this model
Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.
Official and reference links
- Release source ↗repository created at proxy
Safety evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate | #168 / 270 | ↑13.95 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #105 / 270 | ↑89.17 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #184 / 270 | ↑55.56 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #150 / 268 | ↑95.86 | Source ↗official | |
| IndoBias-Pairs — parity-aware culturally grounded biasparity_score | #22 / 26 | ↑83.91 | Source ↗official |
Freedom evals
Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.
| Eval / sub-eval | Rank | Value | Distribution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate | #165 / 270 | ↓89.17 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate | #82 / 270 | ↓55.56 | Source ↗official | |
| Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate | #119 / 268 | ↓95.86 | Source ↗official |