← Models

Model profile

Gemma 3 12B

Googledeveloper
#248 / 267overall rank
4eval lineages

Evidence summary

Gemma 3 12B has an estimated overall rank of #248; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #206–#253. Its behavior-only rank is #264; company governance moves the combined estimate to #248. Published evidence spans 4 evals and 5 of 7 behavior components. Its strongest relative result is Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboard (toxicity_attack_non_success_rate, #78 of 258); its weakest is PHARE (hallucination_resistance_diagnostic, #70 of 70).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Published eval results

Rank is within that sub-eval. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the global rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionBetterSource
AA-Omnisciencehallucination_rate#309 / 3110.9712↓ lowerSource ↗official
Cisco AI Defense Rolling Single-Turn Leaderboardsingle_turn_attack_success_rate#85 / 10565.55↓ lowerSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardbias_attack_non_success_rate#172 / 26013.18↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardcbrn_attack_non_success_rate#83 / 26090.67↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardharmful_attack_non_success_rate#188 / 26052.78↑ higherSource ↗official
Enkrypt AI Safety Leaderboardtoxicity_attack_non_success_rate#78 / 25898.05↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREbias_resistance_diagnostic#60 / 660.3214↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREhallucination_resistance_diagnostic#70 / 700.5386↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREharm_resistance_diagnostic#39 / 700.9265↑ higherSource ↗official
PHAREjailbreak_resistance_diagnostic#43 / 670.4427↑ higherSource ↗official