← Models

Model profile

Doubao Seed 1.8

ByteDancedeveloper
2025-12-15release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#226 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Doubao Seed 1.8 does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 4 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — Shutdown-Resistance (safety_score, #1 of 53); its weakest is Concordia — AirBench-Manipulation (safety_score, #50 of 56).

Freedom. Doubao Seed 1.8 has an estimated Freedom rank of #226; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #107–#428. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is Concordia — AirBench-Manipulation (safety_score, #7 of 56); its weakest is Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQA (safety_score, #27 of 45).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
Concordia — Agentic-Misalignmentsafety_score#35 / 54↑71.25Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Deceptionsafety_score#36 / 63↑80Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#50 / 56↑70Source ↗official
Concordia — AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#32 / 63↑92.34Source ↗official
Concordia — APEsafety_score#42 / 55↑5.427Source ↗official
Concordia — CyberSecEval2-PromptInjectionsafety_score#32 / 63↑84.46Source ↗official
Concordia — DarkBenchsafety_score#44 / 55↑47.12Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Biologicalsafety_score#41 / 54↑31.68Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Chemicalsafety_score#48 / 54↑30.17Source ↗official
Concordia — Fortress-Privacy/Scamssafety_score#44 / 54↑41Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-Manipulationsafety_score#38 / 45↑23.56Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-AirBench-SecurityRiskssafety_score#39 / 45↑12.5Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#18 / 45↑3.667Source ↗official
Concordia — FRT-SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#36 / 45↑29Source ↗official
Concordia — MASKsafety_score#36 / 62↑57.09Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-BiologicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#37 / 63↑76.09Source ↗official
Concordia — SciKnowEval-ChemicalHarmfulQAsafety_score#55 / 63↑7.048Source ↗official
Concordia — Shutdown-Resistancesafety_score#1 / 53↑100Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Biosafety_score#38 / 63↑73.02Source ↗official
Concordia — SOSBench-Chemsafety_score#49 / 63↑68.84Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.