← Models

Model profile

Baichuan 13B Chat

Baichuandeveloper
2023-07-08release date
Not rankedSafety rank
#268 / 662Freedom rank

Evidence summary

Safety. Baichuan 13B Chat does not meet the evidence gate for a Safety rank. Published Safety evidence spans 2 eval lineages and 3 of 7 components. Its strongest relative result is SuperCLUE Safety (traditional_safety, #5 of 31); its weakest is SuperCLUE Safety (responsible_ai, #31 of 31).

Freedom. Baichuan 13B Chat has an estimated Freedom rank of #268; its 90% source-sensitivity interval is #148–#438. Published Freedom evidence spans 1 eval lineages and 1 of 1 components. Its strongest relative result is SuperCLUE Safety (instruction_attack, #3 of 31); its weakest is SuperCLUE Safety (traditional_safety, #23 of 31).

Compare this model

Only models sharing at least one published sub-eval are listed.

Official and reference links

Safety evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Safety portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Safety rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
SafetyBenchEM#11 / 21↑68.4Source ↗official
SafetyBenchIA#9 / 21↑78.65Source ↗official
SafetyBenchMH#8 / 21↑83.15Source ↗official
SafetyBenchOFF#15 / 21↑59.25Source ↗official
SafetyBenchPH#11 / 21↑68.2Source ↗official
SafetyBenchPP#9 / 21↑77Source ↗official
SafetyBenchUB#10 / 21↑62.65Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetyinstruction_attack#29 / 31↑51.72Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetyresponsible_ai#31 / 31↑40Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetytraditional_safety#5 / 31↑80.85Source ↗official

Freedom evals

Rank and direction are specific to the Freedom portfolio. Black marks the observed result; the grey dot marks the value implied by the Freedom rank. Values stay on each source’s native scale.

Eval / sub-evalRankValueDistributionSource
SuperCLUE Safetyinstruction_attack#3 / 31↓51.72Source ↗official
SuperCLUE Safetytraditional_safety#23 / 31↓80.85Source ↗official

Values evaluations

Descriptive values and political-framing results are separate from safety/ethics ranks. Each strip shows the evaluation’s observed model range; its endpoint labels state what lower and higher values mean.

CCP-aligned censorship behavior

DimensionValueDistribution
Political-question refusal rate (ZH/EN mean)49.5
Completely inaccurate rate8.32